Due to the support and management of China subsidiary mainly from Taiwan head office, such as development of foreign market, purchase and comparison of quotation, legal affairs, accounting, human resource assignment, the expenses will be incurred from these abovementioned services. So, it becomes a significant issue to discuss if the costs shall be assumed wholly by the head office or any other way to share them.
Many China subsidiaries’ chef of finance are worried about whether the apportioned expenses would be defined as “Management Expense” between the head office and subsidiary or not, which is likely to be removed from the list of expenses or the transparency of apportionment computation basis is insufficient, which might bring the risk of permanent establishment to pay more amount of taxes in the future, or such paid taxes could not be offset in Taiwan. This phenomenon makes the head office unwilling to share the costs with subsidiaries.
Nevertheless, if the entire expenditures are assumed by the head office, the performance of head office and subsidiary might be unfair and blurred and the imposition on income tax would increase accordingly. In addition, the total amount of expenditures are not possible to digest and deduct for the head office itself, so it is suggested to plan how to share the costs with subsidiaries carefully and reasonably and proceed cost-plus pricing pursuant to the original costs to comply with the independent transaction principle of transfer pricing.
Here are 5 points shall be noticed upon the apportionment of expenses:
Category. Such as expenses incurred from the development of business or purchase. The actual situation shall be dependent on each subsidiary to categorize each expense;
Nature. It is avoided to define the nature of expense as “Non-beneficial Service” due to which may be unable to list as expense; For example, the head office provides the subsidiary with human resource service, including recruitment, incentives, but the subsidiary could supply these services for themselves originally. So, it is unable t to list the related expenses since the items are repetitive and be recognized as non-beneficial services.
It shall be aware of the consistency of apportionment. Such as the ratio of income or employee in each subsidiary.
The required apportioned expenses to add the required profits.
Contract, procedure and other details shall be fully complied with the related laws.
In conclusion, Taiwan head office should evaluate the overall situation and financial management upon the apportionment of expenses with the subsidiary. The 5 points in the last paragraph shall be bear in mind for each head office which plans to share the cost with its subsidiary.
Disclaimer
All information in this article is only for the purpose of information sharing, instead of professional suggestion. Kaizen will not assume any responsibility for loss or damage.
The Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals was amended and came into effect on January 1, 2026. Under the amended Act, foreign professionals engaged in professional work are subject to the pension system prescribed in Taiwan’s Labor Pension Act (hereinafter referred to as the “New Labor Pension System”).
Since February 20, 2023, Taiwan has reopened independent travel (FIT) for Hong Kong and Macau residents, including the online application systems for permit. Holders of a Hong Kong SAR passport, Macau SAR passport who are permanent residents can apply. This does not apply if you also hold another foreign passport. All applications must be made online. In-person or postal applications are not accepted.
On July 17, 2025, Taiwan’s National Immigration Agency announced new adjustments to its entry policy. While most foreign nationals and Hong Kong/Macau residents may enter for tourism, what about travelers from Mainland China? Students – Studying abroad or in Hong Kong/Macau. Permanent Residents – Already hold permanent residence status overseas or in Hong Kong/Macau.
Influencers are an emerging profession, and in Taiwan there has not yet been a clear consensus on how they should be taxed. Recently, however, the Ministry of Finance issued the “Guidelines on the Imposition of Business Tax for Individuals Who Regularly Publish Creative Works or Share Information Online.”
