For a foreign entity that is seeking to do business in Taiwan, a branch and a subsidiary are two commonly utilized methods. From an accounting perspective, a branch is equivalent to an extension of the parent organization and maintains its accounts jointly with the parent. The parent company is fully liable for the branch’s liabilities and legal claims. In comparison, a subsidiary is a separate corporate entity set up by the holding company. It maintains a separate set of books and its liabilities and legal claims cannot be passed on to the parent. When a foreign corporation expands its business in Taiwan, it usually involves in trading of common products, warehouse registration, manufacturing for domestic sale or export sale, or further invest in other business entities in exchange for shares.
Which is the most tax-efficient business structure for a foreign company investing in Taiwan? First, Taiwan tax law imposes a 20% corporate income tax on a foreign corporation’s Taiwan subsidiary earnings, a 21% on the dividends from its after-tax earnings, and a 5% on its undistributed profits. Under the current Taiwan tax law, a foreign corporation is not subject to the 20% tax on dividends earned by its Taiwan subsidiary until the moment the dividends are distributed to the foreign parent company.
Foreign companies are subject to a 20% corporate income tax on its earnings from a Taiwan branch office, and a 0% on the dividends from its after-tax earnings. Because a branch office is an extension of the parent company, it does not pay tax to the Taiwan government on dividends from its after-tax earnings. However, dividends distributed to a foreign company’s Taiwan branch due to its investments in Taiwan, are regarded as directly distributed to the foreign parent company and are subject to a 20% dividend income tax. After we understand the above tax laws, it is easier to choose between a branch or a subsidiary while investing in Taiwan. Therefore, Kaizen recommends:
A foreign company investing in Taiwan will get more benefits by setting up a subsidiary when the main purpose is to further invest in other Taiwanese companies.
When the main purpose of the foreign company’s investment in Taiwan is manufacturing or importing and exporting, a branch office can enjoy more tax benefits.
Apart from the two purposes above, if a foreign company also intends to make real estate investments, setting up a branch office is more favorable in terms of tax.
As discussed above, along with the benefit of investing overseas, to set up an offshore business structure can also meet the operational goal of reducing the tax burden.
All information in this article is only for the purpose of information sharing, instead of professional suggestion. Kaizen will not assume any responsibility for loss or damage.
The Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals was amended and came into effect on January 1, 2026. Under the amended Act, foreign professionals engaged in professional work are subject to the pension system prescribed in Taiwan’s Labor Pension Act (hereinafter referred to as the “New Labor Pension System”).
Since February 20, 2023, Taiwan has reopened independent travel (FIT) for Hong Kong and Macau residents, including the online application systems for permit. Holders of a Hong Kong SAR passport, Macau SAR passport who are permanent residents can apply. This does not apply if you also hold another foreign passport. All applications must be made online. In-person or postal applications are not accepted.
On July 17, 2025, Taiwan’s National Immigration Agency announced new adjustments to its entry policy. While most foreign nationals and Hong Kong/Macau residents may enter for tourism, what about travelers from Mainland China? Students – Studying abroad or in Hong Kong/Macau. Permanent Residents – Already hold permanent residence status overseas or in Hong Kong/Macau.
Influencers are an emerging profession, and in Taiwan there has not yet been a clear consensus on how they should be taxed. Recently, however, the Ministry of Finance issued the “Guidelines on the Imposition of Business Tax for Individuals Who Regularly Publish Creative Works or Share Information Online.”
